Share
  • Make these ads smaller by signing in
    Make these ads smaller by signing in
    Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
    Results 31 to 36 of 36

    Thread: New Formation ??

    1. #31
      Roscono3's Avatar
      champions league vip

      Status
      Offline
      Join Date
      Jul 2009
      Location
      Southend-on-Sea, United Kingdom
      Age
      32
      Posts
      5,911
      Thanks Given
      3,345 Times
      Thanks Received
      2,022 Times
      Mentioned
      178 Post(s)
      Well i was having a chat the other day with the lads down the pub about this and we all thought get rid of pav and get in another tuff tackling CM.

      I dont think we should replace pav with another striker i really beleive we should get another holding player and maybe switch formation from 442 to 4 2 3 1.......

      Maybe only use this formation for away games or if we get injuries but it would look like this!

      ................................. Gomes .................................


      Charlie ..........woody .......................king....................... Benny


      ..............................Hudd........... Wilson................................


      .................azza..................Moddy...... ........... ..Niko................
      .......................................(free roll).........................................

      .......................................JD or crouch....................................
      My favourite spurs player!

    2. #32
      PFA Player of the Year
      Legend !

      Status
      Offline
      Join Date
      Feb 2009
      Location
      East Sussex
      Age
      22
      Posts
      1,540
      Thanks Given
      164 Times
      Thanks Received
      242 Times
      Mentioned
      6 Post(s)
      Quote Originally Posted by SirBillyNick View Post
      There's 4 English and Keane isn't British if you were thinking of him

      so there is......
      my bad mate....


      Roscono, i would agree, but do you think Defoe or Crouch are prolific enough to get us the goals? I personally don't see our midfield grabbing loads of goals, so it would put a lot of pressure on them...
      Liverpool play that way, but fortunately they have a certain Mr Torres who bangs them in for fun. It would make us tougher to beat though, as the midfield would be packed out

    3. #33
      Roscono3's Avatar
      champions league vip

      Status
      Offline
      Join Date
      Jul 2009
      Location
      Southend-on-Sea, United Kingdom
      Age
      32
      Posts
      5,911
      Thanks Given
      3,345 Times
      Thanks Received
      2,022 Times
      Mentioned
      178 Post(s)
      Quote Originally Posted by 1990Hotspur View Post
      so there is......
      my bad mate..


      Roscono, i would agree, but do you think Defoe or Crouch are prolific enough to get us the goals? I personally don't see our midfield grabbing loads of goals, so it would put a lot of pressure on them...
      Liverpool play that way, but fortunately they have a certain Mr Torres who bangs them in for fun. It would make us tougher to beat though, as the midfield would be packed out
      Interesting that you dont think JD could do the job imo his a goalscorer and thats it! Weather he could do it on his own who knows!!

      I just think we dont need the forth striker at the mo i would just stick to the three strikers and if needed to change because of injuries then we could use this formation....

      With this amount of players HR's got problems but atleast its a good problem......
      My favourite spurs player!

    4. #34
      PFA Player of the Year
      Legend !

      Status
      Offline
      Join Date
      Feb 2009
      Location
      East Sussex
      Age
      22
      Posts
      1,540
      Thanks Given
      164 Times
      Thanks Received
      242 Times
      Mentioned
      6 Post(s)
      Quote Originally Posted by Roscono3 View Post
      Interesting that you dont think JD could do the job imo his a goalscorer and thats it! Weather he could do it on his own who knows!!

      I just think we dont need the forth striker at the mo i would just stick to the three strikers and if needed to change because of injuries then we could use this formation....

      With this amount of players HR's got problems but atleast its a good problem......

      To true.....
      I just feel that (even as you say he is a goal scorer, which i agree with) hes not going to bag 20+ every season, like a Torres.

    5. #35
      Moderator
      P UNIT 1980's Avatar
      Tha Mac Daddy Pimp Mo Fo

      Status
      Offline
      Join Date
      Oct 2007
      Location
      NORFOLK
      Posts
      16,914
      Thanks Given
      2,573 Times
      Thanks Received
      5,113 Times
      Mentioned
      250 Post(s)
      ^ you are right but what we do have is 3 x 15ish goal a season strikers!!!

      That is a nice 45ish goals in the onion bag.

    6. #36
      Banned !

      Status
      Offline
      Join Date
      Dec 2008
      Location
      Essex
      Age
      48
      Posts
      5,754
      Thanks Given
      571 Times
      Thanks Received
      887 Times
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)
      Until we stop conceding goals , we have to keep playing with 3 or 4 strikers , and its good on the eyes too . Even though we drew with Bolton we looked like taking away the points for a lot of the game . Harry has said that "we might get spanked a few times by some of the big boys but most of the time we should come away with the points" . Now that's the sort of language that say's fasten your seat-belts cos its gonna be a bumpy ride but exhilarating .

      I like the sound of that !!!

    7. Who Thanked this post

      P UNIT 1980 (12-10-2009)

    Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

    Thread Information

    Users Browsing this Thread

    There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146