Stop trying to spoil the party St. Helen's
It was Bentley's goal, whether you like it or not
Anyway, I'm generally of the opinion that deflections should never be own-goals, no matter how off target the original shot. I think that the goal should go to the striker so long as he can show that he was trying to score a goal with the initial shot. Own-goals should only be awarded to players who turn the ball into their own net, such as from a cross or a poor pass-back. If the shot is so bad that the player taking it can't even really claim 100% that he was trying to score, then people should have to make the decision but otherwise I believe the goal should always be given to the player trying to score.
Just to say a completely ridiculous, hypothetical situation: If a shot was taken, hit the bar as a pigeon flies past, hits the bird & goes in, who gets the goal? I say the striker. If Bent's shot against Liverpool had been going wide, hit that beach ball & still gone in, who get's the goal? I say Bent still should. Kirkland was as aware of that ball hitting him as an inanimate object would be. He wasn't sticking a leg out to try and block it or anything, he knew nothing about it.
It might not be the way the committee decides on who gets the goal but, in my opinion, it should be that way. I don't think it is right that the goal should be given to the person who knew nothing about it instead of the person who was actually trying to score


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote

